Five essays, one argument
The first note from this list. What I have been writing, the single idea underneath all of it, and what you can expect to land in your inbox from here.
Thanks for being here. This is the first note, so let me be quick about what it is and why you might want to keep reading the rest.
I build and ship AI in industries where being wrong is expensive, and I research how to tell whether it actually works. Most of what gets written about AI is either a sales pitch or a prediction, and almost none of it is much use to the person who has to make the decision. I write for that person.
Over the last stretch I put up five essays. They look like five separate pieces, but they are really one argument seen from five angles.
- AI adoption is a management problem, not a model problem, on why most failures are about ownership, not algorithms.
- A demo is not a system, on the enormous distance between something that works once and something that works every day.
- Most AI advice can’t be wrong, on how to tell real guidance from confident noise that was built so nothing could ever disprove it.
- The EU AI Act, in plain terms, on what the law actually requires, minus the fear.
- Shipping is where the work starts, on what running an AI system really involves after go-live.
The single idea underneath all of them: the hard part of AI is almost never the model. It is whether someone owns the thing, whether you can prove it works where being wrong is costly, and whether you keep watching it once it is live. The technology is the easy 30 percent. The other 70 is management, evidence, and attention, and that is the part I keep writing about.
Here is what you have signed up for, so there are no surprises. You will get an email when I publish something worth your time, which is roughly once a quarter, plus the occasional shorter note like this one. No schedule I am padding to fill, no forwarding your address anywhere, and a one-click unsubscribe at the bottom of every email that I will not take personally.
If a specific decision is what brought you here, you can always start a conversation. Otherwise, read whichever of the five above is closest to what you are wrestling with, and I will see you at the next one.
Pedram